![]() Just like his great-uncle David, who chose to rule - briefly - as Edward VIII. He was able to bring any one of those names to the throne with him. Charles' full name is Charles Philip Arthur George. Now, name-swapping was within the realm of reason. A short hop first, to 2005, and a little Christmastime flurry of stories in the UK press claiming Charles was considering one day ruling as King George VII. How could it have been anything else? For the answer, let us travel back in time. Not until the BBC confirmed it with Charles' staff at Clarence House did the world's media agree. Truss being new in the role, and a politician who has had strained relationships with the truth and the law, the matter was in doubt. (Well, first time unless you count 18th century Scotland, but we'll get to that.) It was left to Prime Minister Liz Truss to introduce us to King Charles III for the first time. The new monarch, in his first statement, didn't reveal his name. Continuity was established.īut King what, exactly? And why were some royal watchers convinced it wouldn't be Charles? The royal formerly known as Prince Charles was first described simply as "the King" in the fateful tweet from the Royal Family account, which beat all newscasts in announcing the death of Queen Elizabeth II. For a moment, as a new King acceded to the throne, confusion reigned - over his name.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |